Ledger Flex vs Nano X: Which cold wallet to choose?

Easy

Ledger Flex vs Nano X: Which one to choose to secure your cryptocurrencies?

Wondering if it is better to opt for the Ledger Flex or the Ledger Nano X in order to secure your crypto ? This complete comparison guides you through the key differences between these two Ledger devices , by approaching criteria such as price, security, ergonomics and features. Ledger models , you can also consult our detailed guide to find out which Ledger Choose , where we also compare the Ledger Stax and the Ledger Nano S , two other models in the Ledger range .

Table of contents

Why choose a cold wallet like Ledger ?

The cold wallet S , such as Crypto Ledger , are designed to store your outlet keys A Ledger hardware portfolio offers a level of security much higher than software solutions. Whether you choose a Ledger Wallet like Flex or Ledger Nano , each model allows you to manage your cryptos safely.

By opting for one of the Crypto Ledger , you benefit from access to the Ledger Live , which you to manage your funds, to do staking , or to interact with dApp S. If you want Ledger device , we recommend that you always go through the Ledger site to avoid counterfeits.

Ledger Flex vs nano x: price and positioning

Among Ledger models , the Ledger Flex ™ and the Nano X are distinguished first by their price.

The Nano X and the Ledger Flex ™ do not play in the same category. The Ledger Flex is more expensive, with a price set at € 249, against € 149 for the Nano X, a more affordable price for those who wish a crypto wallet at a lower cost.

This difference is justified by the fact that the Flex offers a good compromise between design, comfort and safety. It is clearly positioned more upscale than the other Ledger Nano wallets , with an innovative e-ink touch screen and a premium finish. Among the most recent models are one of the most complete.

If you plan to switch to the Ledger Flex , it is a relevant choice for users looking for comfort and performance. But for those who favor simplicity at a reduced rate, the Nano X remains an excellent alternative among most popular Ledger models

Ledger Flex vs Nano X:  ergonomics and interaction

The Ledger Flex is a material designed for a more fluid . The Ledger Flex has a 2.84 -inch E Ink® touch nano x . Nano X has an OLED , monochrome and smaller screen, which limits visibility.

ledger Flex
which ledger to choose nano x

Practical screen implications

This new Ledger Flex facilitates navigation: you can read, check and sign transactions directly with clear virtual buttons DEFI platforms like Uniswap or manage NFTS. Thanks to its E INK® touch screen , you have a complete view of the data.

For its part, the Nano X is also competitive, but you have to scroll the information using two physical buttons. This can make the management of Ledger portfolios a little slower, especially when you treat several transactions or check the details of your NFTS.

Ledger bet on ergonomics with this new Ledger Flex , an evolution compared to the Ledger Stax ™ , by making the interface much more user -friendly. In short, Ledger offers a practical product here, secure and adapted to the needs of demanding users.

Concrete example: NFTS management

For lovers of NFTS on Ethereum or Polygon , the flex is much more practical on a daily basis. Thanks to its large screen, you can check the metadata in detail via Ledger Live , before validating a transaction. This considerably reduces the risks of error or phishing.

The Nano X also works via Ledger Live , but its smaller screen requires a more attentive reading, which can become painful if you manage several assets. Stax models , with their wide screens, offer a much more comfortable experience, especially to read long addresses or view NFT .

Those who use Ledger portfolios and want a more fluid and secure experience to manage their NFTS will therefore have an interest in choosing the flex or the stax rather than the Nano X.

Ledger Flex vs nano x: connectivity and mobility

The Ledger Nano X and Flex wallets both integrate Bluetooth, which allows practical mobile use. However, Ledger wallets are not all equal in terms of connectivity.

The Ledger Flex is compatible with NFC technology, which distinguishes it clearly. Thanks to the NFC, simply approach your compatible device to establish a quick and secure connection, without having to go through a classic Bluetooth pairing. It is a significant time saving, especially if you regularly use mobile applications like Metamask or Trust Wallet .

Nano X remains limited to Bluetooth. Although effective, it requires manual configuration to each new pairing, which can represent a brake.

Ledger Flex vs nano x: autonomy and daily use

On autonomy, the Ledger Flex takes the advantage.

The Flex can hold up to 10 hours of conventional use or support approximately 150 transactions before requiring recharging. It is much more than the Ledger Nano X, which remains limited to around 5 hours of continuous use.

For active users, including traders on dYdX or Drift Protocol, this difference is significant. Prolonged autonomy allows you to remain focused on its operations without interruption. Ledger guarantees a fluid experience here, adapted to the most sustained rhythms.

In comparison, the nano X, although solid, imposes more frequent refills. It is not dramatic, but in a quick environment, it can slow down the pace. This is the kind of detail where the most advanced models like those of Ledger make the difference.

Ledger Flex vs nano x: security, a shared priority for your digital assets

In terms of security, the two Ledger place the high bar. Ledger portfolios is based above all on the presence of a secure Element certified, guaranteeing solid protection against physical or software attacks.

The Ledger CC EAL6+ certified Element Element chip , a high level of security used in particular in critical infrastructure. This certification imposes more advanced tests, strengthening resistance to sophisticated attacks.

For its part, the Ledger Nano X has CC Eal5+ chip , which remains more than enough to effectively protect the digital assets from the majority of users. Although the Flex is slightly superior on the technical level, the Ledger Nano X remains a very reliable solution for daily use.

These two devices also incorporate protections against current attacks such as phishing or malware. Thanks to Ledger Recover , an optional recovery solution, users can add an additional safety layer, especially if they fear losing their recovery sentence.

On the construction side, the flex is a more robust physical crypto wallet. It displays a premium design with an aluminum frame and a screen protected by Gorilla Glass , much more resistant than plastic of Nano X. If you often transport your device, the flex offers reinforced durability.

For more details on these models, you can consult the official Ledger , which presents their safety characteristics in detail.

Physical protection

The Ledger Flex is also distinguished by its premium construction. Its aluminum frame and its Gorilla Glass protection glass are better with the shocks and scratches than the entirely plastic body of the Nano X. If you plan to take your wallet everywhere, the Flex is a more durable choice.

Compatibility and management of assets

The Ledger Flex and the Nano X manage more than 5,500 digital assets according to the official product sheets of Ledger . However, if we consult the complete list of supported tokens in detail, we discover that Crypto Ledger are actually compatible with more than 15,000 cryptocurrencies and tokens, including the main standards like ERC-20 and BEP-20 .

The two models are also compatible with Ledger via third -party wallets like Metamask or Trust Wallet , which widens the possibilities of use. This multi-active management is centralized thanks to the Ledger Live , available on computer and Ledger LIVE on your smartphone , which allows you to manage your wallets and transactions with ease.

On the ergonomics side, the Ledger Flex takes the advantage with its touch screen: adding a new blockchain, consulting the sales or installing applications becomes faster and more fluid. The Nano X , with its physical buttons, remains functional, but the experience is less intuitive when it comes to performing several actions quickly.

Conclusion: Ledger Flex or Nano X?

The choice nano vs flex depends mainly on your needs and your budget. If you want a more advanced solution with a touch screen, better autonomy and neat design, you can consider the Ledger Flex as a new high -end wallet to buy. It will be perfectly suitable for demanding users, especially those who often interact with dApp S via the Ledger or who are anxious to have an easy -to -hand screen.

Conversely, if you are looking for a more accessible alternative while maintaining a high level of security, the Nano X remains a safe bet. It offers the essentials to protect your cryptos. You can also use Ledger Live to check compatibility with your assets and follow your wallets.

In any case, which you opt for the Flex vs nano , you benefit from the same security guarantees such as those offered by Ledger on the whole range. For a secure purchase, remember to order from the official Ledger by clicking on the button below .

Investments in cryptocurrencies are risky. Crypternon could not be held responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused following the use of a property or service put forward in this article. Readers must do their own research before undertaking any action and investing only within the limits of their financial capacities. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This article does not constitute an investment .

Certain links of this article are sponsorship links, which means that if you buy a product or you register via these links, we will collect a commission on the part of the sponsored company. These commissions do not train any additional cost for you as a user and certain sponsorships allow you to access promotions.

AMF recommendations. There is no guaranteed high yield, a product with high performance potential implies a high risk. This risk taking must be in line with your project, your investment horizon and your ability to lose part of this savings. Do not invest if you are not ready to lose all or part of your capital.

All our articles are subject to a rigorous verification of the facts. Each key information is verified manually from reliable and recognized sources. When we cite a source, the link is systematically integrated into the text and highlighted by a different color, in order to guarantee transparency and allow the reader to consult the original documents directly.

To go further, read our pages legal notices , privacy policy and general conditions of use .