Easy
Ledger vs Trezor : which crypto wallet to choose in 2025?
Do you want to store your offline cryptocurrencies Ledger or a Trezor ? This detailed comparison simply answers your question: Ledger vs Trezor , which one to buy in 2025 ? We compare key points such as security , the number of supported cryptos , ease of use , additional features and price.
Table of contents
Safety: Ledger puts on the equipment, Trezor on transparency
Ledger : certified material security and closed system
Ledger portfolios incorporate a specialized chip called Secure Element (secure element), certified according to high standards (CC Eal5+ or Eal6+ ). This chip is designed to store your private keys completely isolated from the rest of the device. Even if your phone or computer is compromised, the keys remain protected in this chip, inaccessible to external software.
Ledger uses an internal operating system, Bolos (Open Ledger Operating System Blockchain), which prevents any unauthorized program from running on the device. With each start -up, the system checks that the firmware (internal Wallet software) has not been changed. This strongly limits the risk of attack, but this whole system is owned and is not open to the public audit.
Trezor : open source architecture, more user control
Wallets Trezor work with a 100 % open source , which means that anyone can read, audit or improve the software. This brings some transparency, especially for users who want to understand in detail how their device works.
The Trezor Model One , launched in 2014, has no Element Secure . It therefore stores the private keys in the classic memory of the device. This remains secure in normal use, but in case of physical flight, a well -equipped attacker could try to extract the keys. SAFE 3 and SAFE 5 models incorporate a secure Element certified (EAL6+), designed specifically to strengthen material security, while retaining an open source architecture around this chip.
Summary
- Ledger : very high level of material safety, but closed system not verifiable by third parties.
- Trezor : Total transparency of the code, but hardware protection absent on the Model One.
Cryptocurrencies Managed: Ledger vs Trezor
On the compatibility side, Ledger supports more than 15,000 digital assets via its native Ledger Live application. This includes Bitcoin , Ethereum Ethereum Solana Solana BNB BNB , Polkadot Polkadot Avalanche Avalanche Aptos, Suis as well as the majority of tokens in ERC-20 , BEP-20 and SPL .
Trezor seems to be supported more than 8,000 cryptocurrencies compatible on its SAFE 3 and SAFE 5 models. Trezor does not necessarily take care of certain recent cryptocurrencies with high capitalization. This is the case, for example, popular blockchains such as Suits , Aptos , Ton, Kaspa , Sonic (ex-FTM) as well as tokens with high capitalization like Fetch (ASI) , Hedera or Stacks . Conversely, Ledger already incorporates these assets, which makes them a particularly relevant choice if you invest in these emerging cryptos with high visibility.
Ease of use and additional features: Ledger vs Trezor
Ledger : complete integration for advanced management
Ledger is distinguished by its Ledger Live application, available on Desktop and Mobile, offering an intuitive interface to manage your cryptocurrencies. It not only allows you to consult your sales and carry out transactions, but also to access advanced features such as staking and interaction with decentralized applications ( dApp S ).
- Extended Staking : Ledger Live supports staking of more than 20 assets, including Ethereum , Solana , Polkadot , Cosmos, Tezos , and many others, thus making it possible to diversify your sources of passive income.
- Integration of dApp via WalletConnect : Ledger LIVE INCLUTED WALLETCONECT, facilitating secure access to a multitude of dApp S directly from the application, without requiring complex configurations.
This direct integration offers a fluid user experience, particularly appreciated for frequent interactions with the DEFI .
Trezor : a more traditional approach with limitations
Trezor offers the Trezor Suite application for managing your digital assets. Although it offers basic features such as sending, receiving and managing portfolios, some limitations should be noted:
- Limited Staking : staking is currently restricted in Ethereum , Solana and Cardano , which can limit diversification opportunities for users wishing to maximize their yields.
- Lack of direct integration into the DAPPs dApp unlike Ledger , Trezor does not offer native integration with WalletConnect. To interact with dApp S, users must go through third -party wallets like Metamask, adding a layer of complexity and losing the safety of offline wallets.
These aspects can make the experience less intuitive for users wishing an all-in-one solution for management and interaction with the crypto ecosystem.
Ledger vs Trezor comparative table (2025)
| Model | Price | Screen | Connection | Secure Element | Supported cryptos | Integrated Staking | DAppS / DEFI connection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ledger nano s plus | 79 € | OLED 128 × 64 px | USB - C | Yes (Eal5+) | > 15 000 | Yes (+20 active) | Yes (WalletConnect 2.0) |
| Ledger nano x | 149 € | OLED 128 × 64 px | USB - C + Bluetooth | Yes (Eal5+) | > 15 000 | Yes (+20 active) | Yes (WalletConnect 2.0) |
| Ledger Flex | 249 € | E - tactile e - ink screen | USB - C + Bluetooth | Yes (Eal6+) | > 15 000 | Yes (+20 active) | Yes (WalletConnect 2.0) |
| Ledger Stax | 399 $ | Curved e -ink screen 3.7 ”tactile | USB - C + Bluetooth + wireless recharge | Yes (Eal6+) | > 15 000 | Yes (+20 active) | Yes (WalletConnect 2.0) |
| Trezor Model One | 49 $ | OLED 128 × 64 px | Micro -USB | No | > 1 300 | Yes (limited to 3 active) | No |
| Trezor Safe 3 | 79 $ | OLED 128 × 64 px | USB - C | Yes (Eal6+, open source) | > 8 000 (but missing some recent cryptos) | Yes (limited to 3 active) | No |
| Trezor Safe 5 | 169 $ | Touch -colored screen | USB - C | Yes (Eal6+, open source) | > 8 000 (but missing some recent cryptos) | Yes (limited to 3 active) | No |
Conclusion: Ledger or Trezor, which one to choose?
Ledger and Trezor are two excellent choices in terms of crypto security, each with their own philosophy. Trezor is focusing on transparency with its open source architecture, appreciated by technical users who wish to audit their equipment from A to Z. However, its functional limitations - in particular the absence of direct integration with dApp S, staking restricted to only three assets, and incomplete care of certain emerging blockchains - can represent a brake for active users in the web3 .
On our side, we have a slight preference for Ledger . Its direct integration with WalletConnect, its all-in-one Ledger LIVE application, staking available for more than 20 cryptos, and its compatibility with recent networks like Aptos, Su or Ton make it a more complete solution for modern investors. For a more detailed overview of the different Ledger available, we invite you to visit our detailed comparison on which Ledger choose . Whether you are an advanced beginner or user, Ledger offers a richer environment, especially for those who wish to fully explore the deffi and make their assets grow without going through external tools.
Investments in cryptocurrencies are risky. Crypternon could not be held responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused following the use of a property or service put forward in this article. Readers must do their own research before undertaking any action and investing only within the limits of their financial capacities. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This article does not constitute an investment .
Certain links of this article are sponsorship links, which means that if you buy a product or you register via these links, we will collect a commission on the part of the sponsored company. These commissions do not train any additional cost for you as a user and certain sponsorships allow you to access promotions.
AMF recommendations. There is no guaranteed high yield, a product with high performance potential implies a high risk. This risk taking must be in line with your project, your investment horizon and your ability to lose part of this savings. Do not invest if you are not ready to lose all or part of your capital.
All our articles are subject to a rigorous verification of the facts. Each key information is verified manually from reliable and recognized sources. When we cite a source, the link is systematically integrated into the text and highlighted by a different color, in order to guarantee transparency and allow the reader to consult the original documents directly.
To go further, read our pages legal notices , privacy policy and general conditions of use .
Yohan Uzzan
Training engineer, I quickly became interested in the field of finance. Convinced that decentralized finance has a bright future ahead of it, I participate in its democratization by developing Crypternon.
