Easy
Ledger vs Trezor : which crypto wallet to choose in 2025?
Wondering which Wallet Crypto to choose to effectively secure your digital assets? Trezor and Ledger Trezor material portfolios are among the most reliable solutions on the market. In this detailed comparison, we examine the characteristics of Trezor at the same time as those of Ledger , through essential criteria such as safety, compatibility with cryptocurrencies, integrated features and value for money. Whether you are a beginner or a seasoned user, this guide will help you identify the model that best meets your needs - like Ledger , recognized for its complete environment, or Trezor , appreciated for its transparency and its open source code.
Table of contents
Safety: Ledger puts on the equipment, Trezor on transparency
Ledger : certified material security and closed system
Ledger vs Trezor : when it comes to security, Ledger and Trezor adopt additional approaches, although their priorities differ slightly. Ledger has implemented a strategy focused on hardware security, with its Ledger devices incorporating a Secure Element chip (Eal5+ or Eal6+), a technology used in bank cards for its high level of resistance. This chip completely isolates the Ledger keys from the rest of the system, ensuring their protection even if your computer is compromised. In addition, Ledger uses a chip associated with its homemade operating system, Bolos, which submits Ledger devices to integrity tests at each start to ensure that the firmware has not been modified. The drawback: this environment is closed, not accessible to the public audit.
Each Wallet Crypto Trezor uses fully open source architecture, which allows its software to be freely audited by the community. This transparency particularly appeals to technical users who wish to control total their material portfolio. While the Trezor Model One, older, does not have Secure Element, which makes it more vulnerable in the event of a sophisticated physical attack, this limit does not concern the entire range. The most recent Crypto Trezor portfolios, such as the Trezor Safe 3 and the Trezor Safe 5, now integrate a secure EAL6+certified element, while preserving the opening of the code.
In summary, Trezor and Ledger each offer a high level of security: Ledger put on a controlled owner system from start to finish, while Trezor now combines hardware security and software transparency. The choice between Trezor vs Ledger will therefore depend on your personal preferences: opening of the vs vs ecosystem closed proven.
Cryptomonnaies Supported: Who is the most complete?
On this ground, Ledger is a small step ahead. Thanks to its compatibility with more than 15,000 active ingredients , Ledger Live is compatible with major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin , Ethereum , Solana , Polkadot , but also a very large majority of ERC-20 , BEP-20 , and SPL . It therefore becomes a crypto for investors wishing large asset coverage.
Trezor side , the Trezor Safe 3 , Safe 5 , Trezor Model T and Trezor One support more than 8,000 cryptocurrencies, especially on the EVM . Nevertheless, some very popular recent tokens, such as Suis , Aptos , Toncoin , Kaspa , Sonic , or Fetch (ASI) and Hedera , are not always careful. It is sometimes necessary to go through third -party applications or specific integrations, which can add complexity.
Ledger , for its part, often offers direct support in the Ledger Live application , making the management of these tokens simpler and more fluid.
To avoid confusion, it is recommended to manually check the compatibility of an asset :
Ledger website : https: // www. ledger .com/supported-Crypto-ASETTS
Trezor site (filterable by model): https: // trezor .io/corners
Ease of use and additional features: Ledger vs Trezor
Ledger : complete integration for advanced management
Like Ledger , few solutions offer such a fluid and centralized experience thanks to a unique application: Ledger Live application . Available on computer and mobile, Ledger Live allows you to consult your sales, manage your assets, send or receive cryptos, stike more than 20 digital currencies, and even interact with DAPP dApp via WalletConnect. This advanced integration makes Ledger wallets a leading choice for anyone looking for a crypto wallet to avoid superfluous technical manipulations.
In addition to the extended staking , Ledger Live allows you to manage a very wide variety of assets without going through external services. For active users in the DEFI , that makes Ledger wallets a secure and practical gateway to the web 3 ecosystem.
Trezor has developed an interface called Trezor Suite . This application, like the Trezor range , offers a clear and efficient management of hardware portfolios . There are essential functions: sending, receiving and monitoring of portfolios. However, Trezor Suite shows certain functional limits: staking is currently only possible for Ethereum , Solana and Cardano , which reduces options to generate various passive income.
In addition, the absence of WalletConnect prevents direct access to the dApp S from the application. To do this, users must go through a software portfolio like Metamask , which adds a layer of intermediation and decreases the protection that a cold wallet .
Finally, some models such as the Trezor Model T offer increased use comfort: the Model T has a touch -colored screen with a compact format of 64 mm x 39 mm x 10 mm , practical to transport.
Summary FUNCTIONS:
Ledger LIVE centralizes all functions, including for DEFI , with a modern interface.
Trezor has a simpler and more refined approach, ideal for conventional use but less rich functionally.
The difference between Ledger and Trezor is widening for users who wish to go beyond simple storage and interact fully with the Web3 universe.
Ledger vs Trezor comparative table (2025)
| Model | Price | Screen | Connection | Secure Element | Supported cryptos | Integrated Staking | DAppS / DEFI connection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ledger nano s plus | 79 € | OLED 128 × 64 px | USB - C | Yes (Eal5+) | > 15 000 | Yes (+20 active) | Yes (WalletConnect 2.0) |
| Ledger nano x | 149 € | OLED 128 × 64 px | USB - C + Bluetooth | Yes (Eal5+) | > 15 000 | Yes (+20 active) | Yes (WalletConnect 2.0) |
| Ledger Flex | 249 € | E - tactile e - ink screen | USB - C + Bluetooth | Yes (Eal6+) | > 15 000 | Yes (+20 active) | Yes (WalletConnect 2.0) |
| Ledger Stax | 399 € | Curved e -ink screen 3.7 ”tactile | USB - C + Bluetooth + wireless recharge | Yes (Eal6+) | > 15 000 | Yes (+20 active) | Yes (WalletConnect 2.0) |
| Trezor Model One | 49 € | OLED 128 × 64 px | Micro -USB | No | > 1 300 | Yes (limited to 3 active) | No |
| Trezor Safe 3 | 79 € | OLED 128 × 64 px | USB - C | Yes (Eal6+, open source) | > 8 000 | Yes (limited to 3 active) | No |
| Trezor Model T | 129 € | Touch -colored screen | USB - C | No | > 8 000 | Yes (limited to 3 active) | No |
| Trezor Safe 5 | 169 € | Touch -colored screen | USB - C | Yes (Eal6+, open source) | > 8 000 | Yes (limited to 3 active) | No |
Price comparison
On the side of the Ledger , the Ledger range Exhales from the nano s plus (€ 79), perfect for tight budget users, at Ledger Stax (€ 399), the most high -end model for those who want a wallet with wireless recharge. Between the two, the Ledger Nano X at € 149 brings Bluetooth , which makes it ideal for daily mobile use. The Ledger Flex , more innovative than the Nano with its e-ink touch screen , is offered at € 249.
Trezor , on the other hand, offers more affordable prices:
The Trezor One , at € 49, remains one of material portfolios for beginners, despite the absence of Secure Element .
The Trezor Safe 3 , at € 79, introduces this secure chip without giving up the open source.
The Trezor Model T is offered at € 129 and has a touch screen , but unlike other recent models, the Trezor Model T does not have Element Secure .
The Trezor Safe 5 , at € 169, adds a haptic touch screen and an EAL6+ ELEMENT SECURE , combining ergonomics and safety.
Trezor is cheaper overall, while Ledger offers a wider and integrated range of products The choice will depend on your priorities: code transparency, functional integration or level of security.
Conclusion: Ledger or Trezor, which one to choose?
Ledger and Trezor are two excellent choices in terms of crypto security, each with their own philosophy. Trezor is focusing on transparency with its open source architecture, appreciated by technical users who wish to audit their equipment from A to Z. However, its functional limitations - in particular the absence of direct integration with dAppS, staking restricted to only three assets, and incomplete care of certain emerging blockchains - can represent a brake for active users in the web3 ecosystem.
At the end of this comparison between Trezor and Ledger , it appears that Ledger and Trezor are the two references of the crypto portfolio Trezor portfolios emphasize the open source and the readability of the code, ideal for developers or users concerned with transparency . However, while Trezor limits staking to three active ingredients and does not support certain recent blockchains, Ledger offers wider care , extensive staking , and DEFI functions via Ledger Live .
Trezor and Ledger both offer If you are looking for a Wallet Trezor for simple use, offfi, the Trezor Safe 3 or the Trezor Safe 5 remain reliable options. On the other hand, for an advanced experience, especially with staking , dApp S , or emerging tokens, Ledger device is probably the choice to favor. To get one you can access the official Ledger by clicking on the button below.
And if you are wondering what is the best cold wallet Crypto , there is no universal response, it all depends on your user profile. What is the best crypto portfolio ? The one who responds to your uses: long -term storage , staking , comfort sought, frequent interactions with the defi .
To find out more about each Ledger Wallet , see our guide dedicated to which Ledger Choose . You can also go to the official Ledger to discover Ledger products and secure, reliable and recognized Ledger portfolio
Investments in cryptocurrencies are risky. Crypternon could not be held responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused following the use of a property or service put forward in this article. Readers must do their own research before undertaking any action and investing only within the limits of their financial capacities. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This article does not constitute an investment .
Certain links of this article are sponsorship links, which means that if you buy a product or you register via these links, we will collect a commission on the part of the sponsored company. These commissions do not train any additional cost for you as a user and certain sponsorships allow you to access promotions.
AMF recommendations. There is no guaranteed high yield, a product with high performance potential implies a high risk. This risk taking must be in line with your project, your investment horizon and your ability to lose part of this savings. Do not invest if you are not ready to lose all or part of your capital.
All our articles are subject to a rigorous verification of the facts. Each key information is verified manually from reliable and recognized sources. When we cite a source, the link is systematically integrated into the text and highlighted by a different color, in order to guarantee transparency and allow the reader to consult the original documents directly.
To go further, read our pages legal notices , privacy policy and general conditions of use .
Yoann
Training engineer, I quickly became interested in the field of finance. Convinced that decentralized finance has a bright future ahead of it, I participate in its democratization by developing Crypternon.
